Privacy Declared A Fundamental Right. What About Marital Rape?

न्यूज़ वर्ल्ड इंडिया | 0
| August 28 , 2017 , 18:29 IST

In a historic decision, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court held that privacy is a fundamental right. It said that privacy is an integral part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution and as part of the freedom guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution.

The judgement expands the ambit of privacy to look at individual dignity, bodily integrity and an individual’s right to privacy in the public and the private sphere. This means that the 547-page judgement will have far reaching implications on Aadhaar, Section 377, data protection – and marital rape.

Supreme Court advocate Karuna Nundy, who’s working on the case of marital rape in the Delhi High Court, said, "In the US, the Roe vs Wade judgement that had found that a woman had the right to bodily integrity was founded on the right to privacy. The arguments on Monday in the High Court should be bolstered by a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court stating that citizens unambiguously have the right to privacy. It is, of course, subject to reasonable restrictions."

The judgement attacks the core of the argument against criminalising marital rape, which is, that rape in a marriage is a ‘private matter’ which the state shouldn’t be allowed to interfere in.

ALSO READ: Parched Director Opens Up About Leaked Sex Scenes!

By defining privacy in the context of bodily autonomy and the right to live a life of dignity, the judgement opens up a window of possibility for criminalising marital rape.

Justice DY Chandrachud cites arguments which say that “privacy must not be utilised as a cover to conceal and assert patriarchal mindsets.” He adds, "Patriarchal notions still prevail in several societies.... As a result, gender violence is often treated as a matter of 'family honour', resulting in the victim of violence suffering twice over- the physical and mental trauma of her dignity being violated and the perception that it has caused an affront to 'honour.”

A Misunderstanding, and Some Statistics

On 10 August, it was reported that the Supreme Court has said that “forced marital intercourse and sexual acts part of offence of rape in penal law has been extensively debated and now it cannot be considered as a criminal act.” The apex court was dealing with the specific exception to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) which says that the intercourse or sexual act by a man with his wife, not below 15 years, is not a rape.

However, the apex court was not dealing with the issue of marital rape. The bench was hearing a plea questioning the constitutionality of a provision which allows a man to have a physical relationship with his wife who’s aged between 15 to 18.

ALSO READ: Short Film On Marital Rape Released

Lawyers familiar with the case argue that the limited point under consideration was on the question of the age of consent and whether a girl below 18 years of age can take an informed decision – irrespective of whether she’s married or not.

Marital rape in India is under-reported, and so often under-represented.

According to the National Family Health Survey from 2005-06 cited in a Huffington Post article published on August 2017, 6.6% of women said that they had experienced sexual violence at the hands of their husbands. That’s 66 out of 1,000 women. On the other hand, 0.16% of women – or 1.6 out of every 1,000 women – experienced sexual violence by perpetrators who are not their husbands.

Will a woman’s right to bodily autonomy be buried under society’s construction of a ‘sacred’ marriage? Or will marital rape finally be criminalised? As the petition on marital rape is heard by Delhi High Court in an ongoing case, it’s a question that Indian women will be eagerly awaiting the answer to.